1. What are the deadlines for updating SEEMP Part II and III?
Existing ships shall have onboard the new Confirmations of Compliance for SEEMP Part II and III by 1 January 2026, and new ships delivered after 1 August 2025 by the date of delivery. A revised SEEMP Part II and III should be developed and submitted for review by 31 August 2025 allowing time for ABS to complete the review process.
2. The ship was delivered in 2025 before August. Should it collect data with enhanced level of granularity from 1 August 2025?
No, if the ship was delivered before 1 August 2025 the requirement for collecting data with enhanced level of granularity applies from 1 January 2026 unless the ship is flying the flag of an Administration that implements the amendments early.
3. Should ships subject only to Regulation 27 requirements (DCS) also report cargo carried?
No, the requirement to report cargo carried and subsequently the total transport work is applicable only for ships subject to Regulation 28 on the reporting of annual operational Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII).
4. Is the newly included actual transport work used for the CII Calculation?
No, the supply‑based transport work (based on DWT or GT, as applicable) continues to be used for the calculation of the CII. The newly included actual transport work is not used for the attained CII calculation.
This remains subject to review pending completion of Phase 2 of the CII review.
5. If the SEEMP Part III currently in place has a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) including the required CII for the next years, does it need to be revised?
If the current SEEMP Part III already includes the required CII for 2026, its revision may be carried out in 2026.
6. Is the incinerator considered a fuel consumer, for which the fuel consumption shall be reported?
Yes, incinerators are also to be included as fuel consumers and a method to measure their fuel consumption by fuel oil type shall be developed and implemented.
7. In the event of anchorage before berth how will the distance travelled between anchorage and berth be included in hours under way?
The reporting depends on whether the interval after the anchorage until berth qualifies as “not under way” or includes an “under way” segment.
- If the ship does not reach transit speed after the anchorage, the time from anchorage to berth is not included in the aggregated data for hours under way.
- If the ship does reach transit speed after the anchorage, the time between FAOP and EOSP after the anchorage is included in the aggregated data for hours under way
8. Will the new definition of "under way" reduce the total distance travelled and negatively impact the attained CII?
No. All distance travelled—not limited to the distance while the ship is "under way"—is included in the IMO DCS reporting of "total distance travelled" and used in the calculation of the attained CII.
8. How is the transport work of a voyage calculated in the case of STS operations?
For voyages involving STS operations, the transport work shall be calculated as a weighted average.
9. Can the total consumption by fuel oil type be calculated as the sum of the total fuel consumption by fuel oil type per consumer?
No, the total consumption must continue to be measured using one of the established methods for the total annual fuel oil consumption already described in SEEMP Part II.
10. Is the quantity of residue/sludge to be subtracted from the fuel oil consumed when the method for measuring fuel consumption per consumer type is flow meters?
If the flow meter is installed after the daily tank, it should not be necessary to correct this fuel oil measurement, as sludge will be removed from the fuel oil prior to the daily tank.
11. Is boil-off gas (BOG) required to be reported under the DCS?
The data relating to boil-off gas (BOG) consumed on board the ship for propulsion or operation (e.g. BOG used for propulsion, operational needs such as in a boiler, or burnt in a gas combustion unit (GCU) for cargo tank pressure control or other operational purposes) is required to be collected and reported as fuel.
12. Is the fuel consumption adjusted for methane slip for the calculation of attained CII (e.g. when LNG is consumed as fuel)?
The CII is an IMO metric that evaluates a ship’s carbon intensity based on CO₂ emissions. CII does not account for methane emissions; therefore, no adjustment is needed for methane slip.
13. What are the SEEMP audit requirements for Liberian flagged vessels, with a D or E rating?
For ships flying the Liberian flag, an additional company audit is required if a vessel receives a D rating for two consecutive years (the audit must be conducted in the third year), instead of the three-year interval.
If a ship receives an E rating for two consecutive years, a shipboard audit is required in the following year.
14. How are biofuels treated under IMO DCS and CII Framework?
Biofuels that have been certified as sustainable by an international certification scheme ( provided with a Proof of Sustainability or similar documentation along with the Bunker Delivery Note) and that provide a well-to-wake GHG emissions reduction of at least 65% compared to the well-to-wake emissions of fossil MGO of 94 gCO2e/MJ (i.e. having an E value not exceeding 33 gCO2e/MJ) will be assigned a Cf equal to: Cf = E * LCV
A biofuel not certified as sustainable or that does not fulfil the well-to-wake emission factor criterion, should in its entirety be assigned a Cf equal to the Cf of the equivalent fossil fuel type.
15. How are the biofuels blends treated under IMO DCS and CII Framework?
According to MEPC.1/Circ.905/Rev.1, from 1 January 2027, the Cf for biofuel blends should be calculated as a weighted average by mass of the respective fuels, instead of energy. For the previous reporting years (before 2027), the Cf have been calculated as weighted average by energy.
The biogenic components within biofuel blends, that are not certified as sustainable or do not fulfil the well-to-wake emission factor criterion, should in their entirety be assigned a Cf equal to the Cf of the equivalent fossil fuel type.
16. Can ABS perform a Company SEEMP audit even if another class society issued the DOC?
Yes. ABS may perform the Company SEEMP audit on behalf of the flag Administration upon the client’s request, regardless of which class society issued the Company DOC.